1996-02-06 - Re: How would an FV attack fail? (was: Re: FV’s blatant double standards)

Header Data

From: simsong@vineyard.net (Simson L. Garfinkel)
To: roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
Message Hash: f5f279dc456ab6651081cc1a271d3a0f841db835033e12e32f289d1d20420f14
Message ID: <v02130504ad3d0c0deb0c@[204.17.195.43]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-06 15:04:54 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 23:04:54 +0800

Raw message

From: simsong@vineyard.net (Simson L. Garfinkel)
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 1996 23:04:54 +0800
To: roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org (Roy M. Silvernail)
Subject: Re: How would an FV attack fail? (was: Re: FV's blatant double standards)
Message-ID: <v02130504ad3d0c0deb0c@[204.17.195.43]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:37 PM 2/5/96, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
>
>Could you characterize the failure modes?

Sure thing. Most people on this planet do not read their email through a
TCP/IP stack. They either log onto another program or they use a
proprietary front-end. There are actually many, many different ways that
people send email. That's one of the reasons that FV has been successful
--- you don't need a live TCP/IP connection to the internet to use it.


=============
"Superior technology is no match for superior marketing."
=============
Simson on Tour:

Feb 2 - Feb 5 - Cambridge: Conference on Freely Redistributable Software
Feb 7 - Feb 13 - Baltimore: American Association for the Advancement of
Science.
Feb. 28 - March 1 - Seybold, Boston.
March 23 - NYC. MacFair.
March 27 - March 30: Cambridge. Computers, Freedom and Privacy.







Thread