From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
To: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@qualcomm.com>
Message Hash: fa56cb01cbe2590a2e53808a6fcb29507bb9651124ccb2aa6bde1d55e77aff1a
Message ID: <v02140b17ad5bacd3a265@[204.254.34.231]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-29 22:40:30 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 06:40:30 +0800
From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 06:40:30 +0800
To: Laurence Lundblade <lgl@qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols
Message-ID: <v02140b17ad5bacd3a265@[204.254.34.231]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 12:01 2/29/96, Laurence Lundblade wrote:
>I think a problem occurs when you have 20 billion of
>these certs (two for every person in the year 2010 or such). A simple hash
>into a table isn't going to cut it because you a single database (with
>replication?) isn't going to be possible.
BTW, at the rate that memory gets cheaper and smaller, it might be quite
reasonable to have that single database fit alongside your daily appointments
in your shirt-pocket daily organizer and e-mail terminal, in 2010.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison cme@cybercash.com http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|CyberCash, Inc., Suite 430 http://www.cybercash.com/ |
|2100 Reston Parkway PGP 2.6.2: 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2 |
|Reston, VA 22091 Tel: (703) 620-4200 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Return to March 1996
Return to “Laurence Lundblade <lgl@qualcomm.com>”