1996-03-01 - Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols

Header Data

From: “Joseph M. Reagle Jr.” <reagle@rpcp.mit.edu>
To: Adam Shostack <cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
Message Hash: 015539a5072902001d71589aeeaf6efa1281da1976a7a5ea32c080b664327509
Message ID: <9603011612.AA09147@rpcp.mit.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-01 16:15:11 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 1 Mar 96 08:15:11 PST

Raw message

From: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@rpcp.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 96 08:15:11 PST
To: Adam Shostack <cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
Subject: Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols
Message-ID: <9603011612.AA09147@rpcp.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 07:20 PM 2/29/96 -5300, Adam Shostack wrote:

>key://ftp.clark.net/pub/u/cme/cme-current.asc
>key://ftp.clark.net/pub/u/cme/cme-longterm.asc

        Just as a head up on not duplicating work with regards to 
incorporating URL's into key certificates and DBs you might want to consider 
URI's, URC's or URN's as the piece to bind since URL's are considered to be 
almost as unstable as email..

        Check out for more on these naming schemes.

   Linkname: WRL: Web: URXs
        URL: http://webreference.com/urx.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: cp850

iQCVAwUBMTcfaP0Ael7bLK1/AQG56QQAxr+Tii4UMytdQUXIrKzIp2ckY4UfbGqW
BpkduSxha0lL8Mo2kmzOL4Z3s4NiJMExvzUKOo6Y16MuCXhKgJyxH5VN+Nk1Y/ov
qNpm4zaFOiAFQTbjMhSWJgFGmm6uaHuOez5jZDpSCpZTSBbXUwR349lxXjEtuvy8
hm+w0ADr/VQ=
=SYWa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________
Regards,            There is no point at which you can say, 'Well, I'm
		    successful now.  I might as well take a nap.' -Carrie Fisher
Joseph Reagle       http://farnsworth.mit.edu/~reagle/home.html
reagle@mit.edu      0C 69 D4 E8 F2 70 24 33  B4 5E 5E EC 35 E6 FB 88






Thread