From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 06:51:43 +0800
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <QQaffe12456.199603012234@relay3.UU.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com wrote:

> Next rage might well be "vanity" PGP keys. While at the moment it is not known
> how to create a specific match key to a sequence, if you generate enough
> keys, there will be some interesting sequences found. Possibly some PGP
> signatures will even be in violation of the CDA (now that should start a
> rush 8*).

Funny you should mention that, I noticed a strange message in my key the
other day ...


	Type bits/keyID    Date        User ID
	pub  1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22  Gary Howland <gary@kampai.euronet.nl>
	-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

	mQDKAjED/fgD6AEEANi8U98UJ/Wm3rxiZuPrkvLmOifV8y68MgdRnQQtQDsoGa0L
	OWjoH8yLTVEi8dKeU52Bdr0p+M2TaW8Z+0phW43P9mBaM2sw42vq1FyBxv0EjtEn
	8VbN6i7SC1+Xp4GsX9I8ctlN4y59gEcOFSHFCJjw9heRlM8Cq9M+30vAAdANAekB
	livXDe0T+PGPesUeMedaMliveDehT+PGPesUeMedaMliveDehT+PGPesUeMedaMl
	iveDehT+PGPes6eMA7QlR2FyeSBIb3dsYW5kIDxnYXJ5QGthbXBhaS5ldXJvbmV0
	Lm5sPokBFQIFEDED/i7oDjFwD/HBoQEB3K4H/icZoG0lE5pitriLdqqwNZB0kZiT
	yEnvhg1NqOZwCusHqzMV71S+vDfYYSrl7VjmCVaEOgPAT3kpc7ShXsWpFa4y9pXF
	AjBgR/9crcH98cbrIlGMArKKNiGITGq8tpKvAowyIaG6gn1W7XZRFd0hISrI1C3y
	j13JUFWyYLjNuA/tPiIfZ2h/HUu4LgFr2WhFn4/l3IVcGVLeCLK6Gv4dxd8HEt2d
	mGn7WAygarf7PQevHLIoxElwJkIea6necbgYx5p2GOUNW3/N478n3n6TT1jpu1pU
	RUGYRd5cGYc7z6gXb15FZw0z3uh4ybTEP4pOflBjBPJm27RcEYtuZxSuKQg=
	=Liso
	-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMTcqiyoZzwIn1bdtAQHwaQF/ZBY9JZ6e6dgXjAORuRLQSbRY2JuZHGbN
1a69D0NwvRBdrB4iIjWCdwBQuhXXCd+K
=8nI2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----