1996-03-04 - Re: Duress

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0f778167ce8eec2e62c87e92930829a0e30e877abaaeb8e3ae8683740308a10a
Message ID: <199603042021.MAA25616@netcom7.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-04 23:17:25 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 07:17:25 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 07:17:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Duress
Message-ID: <199603042021.MAA25616@netcom7.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At  2:14 PM 3/4/96 -0500, jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA
Technologies, QC, wrote:
>The transponder analogy might not be very accurate.
>
>When you fly in a controled airspace, the *controller* asks you to 
>dial in certain digits on the transponder.

The analogy may be reaching its elastic limit although you can use those
transponder codes when flying VFR, not in radio contact.  What I really
wanted to suggest is that we try to design (when we can) to minimize the
possibility of bad things happening to people who use duress codes.

Regards - Bill


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | The CDA means  | Periwinkle  --  Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506     | lost jobs and  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | dead teenagers | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread