1996-03-20 - Re: IPG - newest release of the ABC Encryption Algorithms (fwd)

Header Data

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: John Pettitt <jpp@software.net>
Message Hash: 13865cdee916c4c201a7909e5fb361f18352bc1d51a7034cf37baee2ae21c73d
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960319152014.17006A-100000@chivalry>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960319175044.00c7bab8@mail.software.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-20 21:54:01 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 05:54:01 +0800

Raw message

From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 05:54:01 +0800
To: John Pettitt <jpp@software.net>
Subject: Re: IPG - newest release of the ABC Encryption Algorithms (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960319175044.00c7bab8@mail.software.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960319152014.17006A-100000@chivalry>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 19 Mar 1996, John Pettitt wrote:

my first gut reaction is that there looks like the scheme falls 
trivially to 64 bytes of known plaintext, but I didn't look at it closely.

Simon

---
They say in  online country             So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way                  Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man           Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA                   Which side are you on?
  National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37   APL-CPIO






Thread