From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1b98c9ea3f3b08c0fe00cb6f0531af358d4ef9d237258956175a1f998672c1b2
Message ID: <01I25A47RE3MAKTUGH@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-10 02:14:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 10:14:48 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 10:14:48 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Assasination Politics Thread #3
Message-ID: <01I25A47RE3MAKTUGH@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
>"E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@mbcl.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>> Has it? Currently, we've got the guys who deal with the public (the
>>politicians and the low-level bureaucrats) and the faceless drones (the rest
>>of the bureaucrats). The politicians can be protected, and already are to
>>some degree. The low-level bureaucrats aren't _that_ likely to be targeted
>>by enough people to make a difference, and the ones who go bad enough to do
>>so can be protected (or sacrificed, if that seems to be the way to keep the
>>public happy). The faceless drones can be even more faceless, and so very
>>hard to target.
>Just a question to you:
>What makes the faceless drones powerfull?
The classification of low-level bureaucrat known as a cop. See above
for the problems with them.
-Allen
Return to March 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-03-10 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 10:14:48 +0800) - Assasination Politics Thread #3 - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>