1996-03-27 - RE: ITAR double standards?

Header Data

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
To: blanc <blancw@accessone.com>
Message Hash: 20128e12845c10594f3df57dab71cad69a4d38ed4105076794b62895b52d5914
Message ID: <ad7ccd6c0a021004c603@[205.199.118.202]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-27 16:23:27 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 00:23:27 +0800

Raw message

From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 00:23:27 +0800
To: blanc <blancw@accessone.com>
Subject: RE: ITAR double standards?
Message-ID: <ad7ccd6c0a021004c603@[205.199.118.202]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 6:13 AM 3/26/96, blanc wrote:
>From:   Timothy C. May
>
>I think there's been ample evidence that the ITARs are often used to harass
>U.S. companies that "won't play ball," that refuse to go along with certain
>governmental policies. (Part of the think we libertarians hate about Big
>Government and Lots of Laws is that government can use selective
>enforcement an another lever of power. As a felon, I am acutely aware of
>this power.)
>............................................................................
>
>You're a felon? For real?
>

Yes.

--Tim


THE X-ON CONGRESS:  INDECENT COMMENT ON AN INDECENT SUBJECT, by Steve
Russell, American Reporter Correspondent....You motherfuckers in Congress
have dropped over the edge of the earth this time... "the sorriest bunch
of cocksuckers ever to sell out the First Amendment" or suggesting that
"the only reason to run for Congress these days is to suck the lobbyists'
dicks and fuck the people who sent you there," ....any more than I care
for the language you shitheads have forced me to use in this
essay...Let's talk about this fucking indecent language bullshit.







Thread