1996-03-26 - Remailer restrictions: coming soon to your burg?

Header Data

From: “Robichaux, Paul E” <perobich@ingr.com>
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 208b3355a4f3adf7315d39f0ccd2839b5f96738649db458bad8dcc513fa605b7
Message ID: <c=US%a=%p=INTERGRAPH%l=HQ6960326082809HN003700@hq14.pcmail.ingr.com>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1996-03-26 19:41:12 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 03:41:12 +0800

Raw message

From: "Robichaux, Paul E" <perobich@ingr.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 03:41:12 +0800
To: Cypherpunks <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Remailer restrictions: coming soon to your burg?
Message-ID: <c=US%a=_%p=INTERGRAPH%l=HQ6960326082809HN003700@hq14.pcmail.ingr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Josh Quitter recounts the sorry tale of a small-town city councilman whose 
phone number got attached to one of those phone-sex ads in alt.binaries.*. 
See 
<http://pathfinder.com/@@EGI8H7KFBQAAQAGs/time/magazine/domestic/1996/960401  
/web.html> for full details.

So, what does the councilman do? From the article:
>On Feb. 6, at Suponcic's urging, the Willowick city council passed a 
resolution asking the state
>and federal governments to close the "loopholes" that allowed anonymous 
remailers to operate
>outside the authority of U.S. law-enforcement officials. "Once you've 
achieved one of these
>anonymous identities, you're dangerous, and there's no way law enforcement 
can track it,"
>Suponcic says. "The animal's out of control." 

Just like with "communications decency", watch out at the local level.

-Paul







Thread