From: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2c5fdaa0ceb8ff14341788afb28e0f22d42df181ed6d34ab5a3b92e03b9754fc
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960321204027.00942628@mail.teleport.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-21 23:53:01 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 07:53:01 +0800
From: Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 1996 07:53:01 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: IPG message
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960321204027.00942628@mail.teleport.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
[IPG legal nonsense deleted]
> 1. The use of the word Ultima for the system, because it is
> impossible to have a either a more secure system - it is
> impossible to break the Ultima system, other equally difficult
> to break systems may exist, or may be formulated in the future,
> for example a true OTP, and in those cases, they may
> "theoretically" be more difficult to break than the IPG Ultima
> System, for example a true OTP. However, that would exist only in
> theory, because in those eventiualities, none of the
> systems would be breakable.
I wonder what Lord British (of the famed Ultima computer game series) would
have to say about the trademark of this name? (Not to mention the
incredible run-on sentence...)
The more I read their prose, the more I think that they must be
experimenting with ergotic chemistry on the side.
| Remember: Life is not always champagne. Sometimes it is REAL pain. |
|"The moral PGP Diffie taught Zimmermann unites all| Disclaimer: |
| mankind free in one-key-steganography-privacy!" | Ignore the man |
|`finger -l alano@teleport.com` for PGP 2.6.2 key | behind the keyboard.|
| http://www.teleport.com/~alano/ | alano@teleport.com |
Return to March 1996
Return to “Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>”
1996-03-21 (Fri, 22 Mar 1996 07:53:01 +0800) - Re: IPG message - Alan Olsen <alano@teleport.com>