1996-03-05 - re: NYT on crypto

Header Data

From: “A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security” <PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 30b980bb258f790a34da7f718a52af8b8515bb12cbd48bff0a16ea550540a98f
Message ID: <960304183355.20202bb5@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-05 11:39:13 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 19:39:13 +0800

Raw message

From: "A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security" <PADGETT@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 19:39:13 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: NYT on crypto
Message-ID: <960304183355.20202bb5@hobbes.orl.mmc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>I thought that, for the most part, the telegraph systems described
>above were to reduce cable charges (1 code word instead of a 15-word
>sentence, a huge savings in those days).  

Was one use however I seem to recall citations dating back to Niccolo Polo
reguarding the use of trade codes & that was a while before the telegraph.
If I were really curious, would also check out Reuters, Lloyds, Rothchilds,
and the Borgias. Would not be surprised to find a reference in either/all
"The Prince", "The Art of War",  and the letters of Nathan Hale.

However I suspect that Markoff really meant to be referring to mathematical
algoritms such as the LOASDR. I suppose that only dates back to the
diameters of stygi (sp ?) about the same time that passwords were first 
recorded (and changed daily).
						Warmly,
							Padgett

ps if anyone has a spare LOASDR or CMSDR, I would be interested 8*).





Thread