From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Message Hash: 3b4d77ae2f58919073fc88c6f4f2f4bbd77fd36fbb071956f838d48598b2ca34
Message ID: <199603290803.AAA06737@mail1.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-29 17:59:00 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 01:59:00 +0800
From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 1996 01:59:00 +0800
To: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Message-ID: <199603290803.AAA06737@mail1.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 03:43 PM 3/27/96 -0500, Shabbir J. Safdar wrote:
> Your misunderstanding of how interceptions are done is dangerous to
> what is otherwise a rational, intelligent argument.
>
> Indeed, there are ways to conduct a wiretap without a judge. They require
> dispensations from people like the Attorney General, for example. And
> this is certainly not a normal practice.
I suggest that you study arithmetic before pontificating on normal government
practice:
1% of all phone capacity = 850 wiretaps a year. Yeah, right.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to March 1996
Return to “jamesd@echeque.com”
1996-03-29 (Sat, 30 Mar 1996 01:59:00 +0800) - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary? - jamesd@echeque.com