1996-03-22 - Re: NT’s C2 rating
Header Data
From: Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 3bf9e47eb18d64e60edeb9bffb6885411d24f2584a5ad5608c00c0f341aded20
Message ID: <1.5.4b11.32.19960322131321.006d1880@softserv.spectrum.titan.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-22 23:36:16 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 07:36:16 +0800
Raw message
From: Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 07:36:16 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: NT's C2 rating
Message-ID: <1.5.4b11.32.19960322131321.006d1880@softserv.spectrum.titan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>> Basically, I'm now questioning the C2 rating of Windows NT. The
>> entire security layer is modular to the Kernel. As a modular
>> driver, it can be removed, rewritten, and replaced.
Has the product actually been evaluated and put on the EPL? Or is Microsoft just claiming it meets the C2 requirements?
Mike Tighe
tighe@spectrum.titan.com
http://www.tcst.com/~tighe/
Thread
Return to March 1996
Return to “Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>”
1996-03-22 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 07:36:16 +0800) - Re: NT’s C2 rating - Mike Tighe <tighe@spectrum.titan.com>