From: Tim Fulbright <100022.3167@compuserve.com>
To: Mark Allyn 206-860-9454 <allyn@allyn.com>
Message Hash: 4139e7e88ad054df95b5e5c5b9870174da690ef0825e0c9e99b3aba035a54922
Message ID: <960305135536100022.3167_EHV125-1@CompuServe.COM>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-05 14:28:43 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 22:28:43 +0800
From: Tim Fulbright <100022.3167@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 22:28:43 +0800
To: Mark Allyn 206-860-9454 <allyn@allyn.com>
Subject: Re: Truelly Random Numbers
Message-ID: <960305135536_100022.3167_EHV125-1@CompuServe.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Now I, a lurker for two months, am truelly confused! L. Deitweiler must be
right. Surely one of you cyperpunk fellows could hack together a dongle with
some kind of AD converter and buffer ram to gather a Truelly Random Bitstream
off the environment every couple of milliseconds easier than this raindrop
scheme or recording the fan, you're haviung me on!. Let's go back fifty years
and get a vacuum tube to fitfully flicker? I who know next to nothing about
electronics suspect there is surely enough noise present in electornic devices
to gather a random bitstream that you could chop anywya you needed? Anyway, y
would you need a WAN for constant raindrop number generation when you could
just set up your random number node out in LaPush or up in Volcano sampling
every minute ot so : ) ? My second overall question is, isn't the emphasis on
encryption of e-mail and e-mail emposters somewhat shortsighted? What if, for
the masses which is all that counts, e-mail migrates to voicemail? The issues
aren't the same with voicemail, eg PK validation problems go out the window
since voicemail validation could take the form of an PK encrypted voicegram. .
Something the matter with that? It might also prevent robots from posing as
persons while still allowing aliases.. Please pardon this interruption! I
really do admire the frankness and quality of your newslist, its democratic open
discussion on the most vital political issues facing our time ; but after
reading your mail I think that either I need seriously wising up, or, somebody
must know where the real newsgroup is!
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Requires PGP version 2.6 or later.
mQCNAzBzoaUAAAEEAKwZn14pn79xPqUJW5SbJqU/B1uEtD29xe4/nXedIlc66yt0
+Zh8t/LZtO8CAQn4N5tqzN+cW0ot4yfB1lV2HYOkLCqtfeGqrZbv0q8auR0OV8fQ
NvHRdlK5fbZKtFKzEA1y/eh5BQv6pq9YDsoScNdORuynOFYo60208YzGKULxAAUR
tEJUaW1vdGh5IEZ1bGJyaWdodDwxMDAwMjIuMzE2N0Bjb21wdXNlcnZlLmNvbT48
Wys0NCwgMF0gMTc4MjYxMTY1MT4=
=gSuk
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Return to March 1996
Return to “Tim Fulbright <100022.3167@compuserve.com>”
1996-03-05 (Tue, 5 Mar 1996 22:28:43 +0800) - Re: Truelly Random Numbers - Tim Fulbright <100022.3167@compuserve.com>