1996-03-15 - Re: How’s that again?

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: Bill Stewart <unicorn@schloss.li>
Message Hash: 492dd5a7c6cce3cd3cf09316492e64276d2566cfcc28b3539a5a8a8f4bc7fd87
Message ID: <199603131614.IAA03491@dns1.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-15 00:31:46 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 19:31:46 -0500

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 19:31:46 -0500
To: Bill Stewart <unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: How's that again?
Message-ID: <199603131614.IAA03491@dns1.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:37 PM 3/12/96 -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
> I guess it's no surprise that one of the more-or-less "good guys"
> in the Senate can propose a law so ambiguously worded that it
> looks good on the face until a good lawyer takes the time to rip
> it apart

Looking for "good guys" in Washington is like Ronald Reagan looking 
for "moderates" in Iran.  On crypto, and on taxes, our interests 
and their their interests are completely opposed.  We should not 
care about, or take any interest in, the slight difference between 
the "moderate" and extremist members of the Senate and the House 
of Representatives.


The best bill we can ever hope to get out of Washington is no
bill at all.
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread