1996-03-06 - Re: PGP 3.0/4.0

Header Data

From: Nelson Minar <nelson@santafe.edu>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 4aa1d58d4231d30143b6cf85b0ef7f70a2a648d0cacd1ae1726ad403dc5d740c
Message ID: <199603060755.AAA00215@nelson.santafe.edu>
Reply To: <199603030054.QAA28612@ix7.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-06 09:20:34 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 17:20:34 +0800

Raw message

From: Nelson Minar <nelson@santafe.edu>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 17:20:34 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP 3.0/4.0
In-Reply-To: <199603030054.QAA28612@ix7.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199603060755.AAA00215@nelson.santafe.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>the last time I put together a 6,000 key ring on a 386 it took three
>days & several Mb.

The MIT PGP keyserver now has new non-PGP based code to manage it's
keyring of 20,000+ keys. Not sure if you can get the code, or how easy
it'd be to adapt to a deployed usage, but presumably it's much more
efficient.

Thread

• Return to March 1996

• Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>”
• Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
• Return to “David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>”
• Return to “Nelson Minar <nelson@santafe.edu>”

• Return to “Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>”

• 1996-03-03 (Sun, 3 Mar 1996 09:27:16 +0800) - Re: PGP 3.0/4.0 - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
  • 1996-03-06 (Wed, 6 Mar 1996 17:20:34 +0800) - Re: PGP 3.0/4.0 - Nelson Minar <nelson@santafe.edu>
    • 1996-03-06 (Wed, 6 Mar 1996 21:41:41 +0800) - Re: PGP 3.0/4.0 - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
      • 1996-03-06 (Wed, 6 Mar 96 06:57:05 PST) - Re: PGP 3.0/4.0 - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
        • 1996-03-10 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 05:03:55 +0800) - Re: PGP 3.0/4.0 - Piete Brooks <Piete.Brooks@cl.cam.ac.uk>