1996-03-10 - Re: PGP to PC mail integration
Header Data
From: lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Message Hash: 50fbfbd4b6b58715f6158c8a7b49dbb61d5b337aaa33c09ddb8d2f83cf4fd2b7
Message ID: <199603011533.KAA11422@opine.cs.umass.edu>
Reply To: <199603010652.WAA00782@cryptical.adnetsol.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-10 05:58:38 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 13:58:38 +0800
Raw message
From: lmccarth@cs.umass.edu
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 13:58:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks Mailing List)
Subject: Re: PGP to PC mail integration
In-Reply-To: <199603010652.WAA00782@cryptical.adnetsol.com>
Message-ID: <199603011533.KAA11422@opine.cs.umass.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mike Ingle writes:
> Exactly. Yes, it will at least have to have a config screen. It will
> probably have to prompt for a passphrase on the fly, unless you want to
> store it. It can ask to encrypt or not, or it can have a header in the
> message. The important thing is I don't care about the user interface
> of the mail program. This has been the big barrier so far.
In spite of my previous grouchiness on this issue, I like the idea and I
think it's worth pursuing.
-Lewis
Thread
Return to March 1996
- Return to “lmccarth@cs.umass.edu”
Return to “Mike Ingle <inglem@adnetsol.com>”
- 1996-03-02 (Sat, 2 Mar 1996 09:22:54 +0800) - Re: PGP to PC mail integration - Mike Ingle <inglem@adnetsol.com>
- 1996-03-10 (Sun, 10 Mar 1996 13:58:38 +0800) - Re: PGP to PC mail integration - lmccarth@cs.umass.edu