From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 57b7b9f4230c91316235ee5605cd4e3ae8364a2cda000163ac20afa71c58d67d
Message ID: <199603151625.IAA21520@mail1.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-15 18:16:25 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 02:16:25 +0800
From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 02:16:25 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FCC-type Regulation of Cyberspace
Message-ID: <199603151625.IAA21520@mail1.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Timothy C. May wrote:
>>Mr. Frantz, unless you can prove your claims here, forthwith, I must inform
>>you that they are in violation of the Truth in Speech Act of 1996. Please
>>retract them, now.
Bill Frantz wrote:
>Political speech, not commercial speech. The act doesn't apply or is
>unconstitutional.
I see: The bill of rights reads:
"Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom of *political*
speech".
Never knew that until now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to March 1996
Return to “jamesd@echeque.com”