From: Just Rich <rich@c2.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 57e2b3b6280c1793cd958f463121552cb6014bf5b2d58b1fbd95fcaaa989cac9
Message ID: <199603040511.AAA24235@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-04 23:57:39 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 07:57:39 +0800
From: Just Rich <rich@c2.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 07:57:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailers run by spooks
Message-ID: <199603040511.AAA24235@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 4 Mar 1996, Anonymous (or so he thinks!) wrote:
> >Both presenters explicitly acknowledged that a number of anonymous
> >remnailers in the US are run by government agencies scanning traffic.
> >Marlow said that the government runs at least a dozen remailers and that
> >the most popular remailers in France and Germany are run by the
> >respective government agencies in these countries. In addition they
> >mentioned that the NSA has successfully developed systems to break
> >encrypted messages below 1000 bit of key length and strongly suggested
> >to use at least 1024 bit keys. They said that they semselves use 1024
> >bit keys.
>
> I don't know about everyone else, but I consider this, if true, to be a
> MAJOR worry. It never ceases to amaze me how lightly the government takes
> lying to the people. Unfortunately I don't have the contacts or resources
> to do any further investigation, I hope this thread is resolved one way or
> another soon.
Yeah, didn't you know that Sameer was on the CIA payroll? How do you
think he paid for his new Ferrari?
I have no doubt that the CIA can break 1000-bit keys on a case-by-case
basis, *if they decide to allocate the resources*. I think it's possible
that some remailers are run by spooks. However, I seriously doubt that
anyone is breaking stuff routinely, and I think the web of trust is pretty
good. Of course, the CIA had Ames... the reverse could easily be true.
However, I also have no doubt that Strassmann and Marlow are spreading
disinformation and exaggerating their capabilities in an attempt to break
the web of trust and incite a witch hunt. It won't work. The answer in any
case is more use of remailers, not less. Just turn up the noise level.
You already know that nothing is 100% secure, but you do what you can.
It's a war of attrition.
- -rich
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMTp7ayoZzwIn1bdtAQFJXgGAg8I4+IwZYrDI46bMj2nED+Dh0AeoMJVs
PP10Ui5u46sXDAUjpMzJSwv5EqdIOEKy
=611k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to March 1996
Return to “Just Rich <rich@c2.org>”