1996-03-15 - Re: Remailer passphrases

Header Data

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 58332525f638eeef03cbd97265683ed6e5ac0680182cfd517f0933c1d119f8d0
Message ID: <199603141930.LAA03089@netcom6.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-15 04:37:08 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 12:37:08 +0800

Raw message

From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 12:37:08 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailer passphrases
Message-ID: <199603141930.LAA03089@netcom6.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:12 AM 3/14/96 -0500, JonWienke@aol.com wrote:
>In a message dated 96-03-14 01:52:14 EST, you write:
>
>>It is probably possible.  Put a clip across the CPU chip, and take over
>>from it by raising it's chip disable will work with some microprocessors. 
>>However, the proper application of various kinds of rubber hose to the
>>operator should make that kind of attack unnecessary.
>
>In general, this is an excellent way to make smoke and big sparks, which
>(since shorts tend to overtax the power supply and drop voltage levels) is a
>good way to clear system RAM, thus defeating the purpose of the exercise.
> Software hacks can do the job just as well, and don't require special
>breathing apparatus.

Provided you insist on UNIX.  I still think rubber hoses will be the
technique of choice.  That was what the Scientologists used on
anon.penet.fi.

Regards - Bill


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | The CDA means  | Periwinkle  --  Computer Consulting
(408)356-8506     | lost jobs and  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | dead teenagers | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA







Thread