1996-03-14 - Re: Remailer passphrases

Header Data

From: JonWienke@aol.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 59fe60b86aeb6ed3bd181cbedcf5cb9912185320865639dfd63cee3d0028fc1c
Message ID: <960314111212446292183@emout04.mail.aol.com>
Reply To: _N/A

UTC Datetime: 1996-03-14 19:13:30 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 14:13:30 -0500

Raw message

From: JonWienke@aol.com
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 14:13:30 -0500
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Remailer passphrases
Message-ID: <960314111212_446292183@emout04.mail.aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In a message dated 96-03-14 01:52:14 EST, you write:

>It is probably possible.  Put a clip across the CPU chip, and take over
>from it by raising it's chip disable will work with some microprocessors. 
>However, the proper application of various kinds of rubber hose to the
>operator should make that kind of attack unnecessary.

In general, this is an excellent way to make smoke and big sparks, which
(since shorts tend to overtax the power supply and drop voltage levels) is a
good way to clear system RAM, thus defeating the purpose of the exercise.
 Software hacks can do the job just as well, and don't require special
breathing apparatus.

Jonathan Wienke





Thread