From: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: adam@lighthouse.homeport.org
Message Hash: 5aed61efc9f1420a1b1192e27a30adf0cb68019c0cf3f7db405bba7a7b981aaa
Message ID: <01I26QNY0Q3MAKTUBC@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-11 20:00:19 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 04:00:19 +0800
From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 04:00:19 +0800
To: adam@lighthouse.homeport.org
Subject: Re: Cryptanalysis
Message-ID: <01I26QNY0Q3MAKTUBC@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
From: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
>From: TCMay:
>| cryptanalysis. (Not to sound harsh to Allen, but why would anyone ask here
>| on the list for recommendations to such a standard subject when Schneier,
>| Garfinkel, Denning, etc. all have books listed?)
> Niether Schneier nor Garfinkel really talk about analysis.
>The only book I can think of is Biham's "Cryptanalysis of the DES,"
>and thats on a single technique.
I wasn't asking about cryptanalysis; I was asking about codes (as
opposed to cyphers).
-Allen
Return to March 1996
Return to ““E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>”
1996-03-11 (Tue, 12 Mar 1996 04:00:19 +0800) - Re: Cryptanalysis - “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>