1996-03-12 - Re: Cryptographers against cryptography

Header Data

From: drose@AZStarNet.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5b7cc448ad5628b596d5f932d0a18801506ae063459fed5acbae1d5498a54b5b
Message ID: <199603112146.OAA25645@web.azstarnet.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-12 17:08:17 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 01:08:17 +0800

Raw message

From: drose@AZStarNet.com
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 01:08:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Cryptographers against cryptography
Message-ID: <199603112146.OAA25645@web.azstarnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com writes:
>> This is the second in a regular series of postings to expose
>> cryptographers and cypherpunks who are either lying to us or
>> making a very serious mistake in there judgement.
>
>No, this is the umpteenth stupid anonymous denunciation of people who
>deserve no such stupidity.
>
>You aren't fit to eat Bruce Schneier or Matt Blaze's toenail
>clippings.
>
>Perry

I frequently have a problem with Perry's proprietary and bumptious
mother-hen approach to the c-punks list; in this specific instance, I
applaud his sentiments.

To Mr/Ms/Space Alien (anonymous): It would be nice if you had the decency to
identify yourself, but in any case, please bugger off (and don't keep
pulling out that Thorazine drip connected to your arm).

--Dave Rose






Thread