From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 17:38:57 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Message-ID: <199603260516.VAA06327@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 12:23 PM 3/25/96 -0800, Timothy C. May wrote:
> Besides, I think the best way to overturn the
> ITARs is through a court challenge; as I have noted, even the NSA's lawyers
> felt that the ITARs would not withstand court scrutiny.

Note that the spooks have carefully avoided a full bore court 
showdown.  They harassed Phil until the statute of limitations 
caught up with them, but never brought it to trial.  If we had
no further legislation, and the courts broke ITAR, we would
be home free.  No plausible legislation could give us that.

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com