From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: Gary Howland <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 64e9c390d37f41083c42a196de58f51cc1b313f3a03fdf7e65fd9240af97735a
Message ID: <199603031913.LAA02889@mail1.best.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-03 19:48:33 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 03:48:33 +0800
From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 03:48:33 +0800
To: Gary Howland <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Truelly Random Numbers
Message-ID: <199603031913.LAA02889@mail1.best.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 10:11 AM 3/3/96 -0500, Gary Howland wrote:
>Surely the process of counting up until you get a prime means
>that the chances of getting certain primes are greater than
>others (eg. 17 is more likely than 19) ?
In order to use this information, one would need to determine
the number of primes in the vicinity of a potential prime factor.
This costs more than actually checking for the factor, hence is
not useful.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to March 1996
Return to “jamesd@echeque.com”
1996-03-03 (Mon, 4 Mar 1996 03:48:33 +0800) - Re: Truelly Random Numbers - jamesd@echeque.com