1996-03-28 - Re: Traffic Jams on the Internet

Header Data

From: “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6b0a43228f0b133c71187ecae53d6d461b8b3ea4c5f1f1bbf9f06f50b4c0a431
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.92.960327154818.274A-100000@gak>
Reply To: <01I2SQ2FUST88ZDZ7I@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-28 20:40:57 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 04:40:57 +0800

Raw message

From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 04:40:57 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Traffic Jams on the Internet
In-Reply-To: <01I2SQ2FUST88ZDZ7I@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.92.960327154818.274A-100000@gak>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Tue, 26 Mar 1996, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:

> 	It occurs to me that it would be good if people sent in some
> non-governmental/hierarchial solutions to this problem, such as ones using
> digital cash as "postage" for prioritized mail.

I read an article on various Internet pricing schemes a while ago and one
of the ideas was a pretty clever solution.  Internet services would be
classified according to their bandwidth requirement and need for
interactivity.  The cost per byte of e-mail might be very cheap whereas the
cost per byte for videoconferencing might be more.  There's no real way to
rip off this scheme, because if you try to send an e-mail and classify it
as "high priority" it is more expensive.

- --Mark

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
markm@voicenet.com              | finger -l for PGP key 0xf9b22ba5
http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/ | bd24d08e3cbb53472054fa56002258d5
"The concept of normalcy is just a conspiracy of the majority" -me

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBMVmq47Zc+sv5siulAQEIPwP/UG53An/wt2YzhBsxjFUDCK6eXwnVgPCg
jCCxRCGIKOZXeTUfXxK390+XyZqFnue9TjJU1o5g+zMDqBei8AYCx7q3GV94BdPL
2dBFp4IszlNX+KDQs6XUYHkZP6sIIJZrN8wRA7yOhVQZWguzUPhkX71DkilYw2lO
o1sqOAgsviU=
=RXt3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----







Thread