From: Gary Howland <gary@kampai.euronet.nl>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 70787ab3995424fe0b9895c0d0a028ae8383ed611a53f50b8fd6765305d3ae62
Message ID: <199603121049.FAA20806@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-12 13:39:54 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 21:39:54 +0800
From: Gary Howland <gary@kampai.euronet.nl>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 21:39:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FCC & Internet phones
Message-ID: <199603121049.FAA20806@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Adam Shostack wrote:
> Loren James Rittle wrote:
> | >Most
> | >presumably use a mix of a UDP data connection and tcp for control
> | >functions.
> |
> | OK, everything after the IP header is encrypted. I don't even know
> | which protocol is in use.
>
> Are you willing to play Mallet? Drop IP packets, and look for
> duplicates. Those are TCP. (IPSEC might handle this, but I bet there
> will be broken implementations that save time by resending.)
Are you saying UDP protocols don't retransmit un-acked packets?
If not, then you can't be sure the duplicates are TCP.
Gary
- --
pub 1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22 Gary Howland <gary@kampai.euronet.nl>
Key fingerprint = 0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D 1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBMUVWwioZzwIn1bdtAQHQaAGA1EjYZpEKrie9t/eIohlrHCC4rUY8Dzu1
HgB+1ZbAS8X7hIRb3eSHLlBB13LZtkDH
=4Tgg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to March 1996
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”