From: “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@UNiX.asb.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: 71619e26e84c272fba7b118db4dfb0ae1227cecdaa1f3c1df5f3d69d0f98167d
Message ID: <199603130646.BAA03568@UNiX.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-14 04:09:05 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 12:09:05 +0800
From: "Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@UNiX.asb.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 12:09:05 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM
Message-ID: <199603130646.BAA03568@UNiX.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
> Well, okay, but we've really got to define whose key is being escrowed,
> anyway. Most corporations will probably handle it themselves, OR they will
> only give an ENCRYPTED escrowed key to the escrow agent. This would prevent
[..]
They may use secret sharing or splitting methods and handle parts by
different organizations within themselves and hand other parts to an
outside agent. Sometimes this makes sense when there are political
rivalries within an organization. They want the ability to get into
Dilbert's files if he drops dead, but they want an objective party to
hold part of the key so his rivals don't try to steal his files.
Rob.
---
Send a blank message with the subject "send pgp-key" (not in
quotes) to <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com> for a copy of my PGP key.
Return to March 1996
Return to ““Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@UNiX.asb.com>”
1996-03-14 (Thu, 14 Mar 1996 12:09:05 +0800) - Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM - “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@UNiX.asb.com>