1996-03-19 - Re: IPG - newest release of the ABC Encryption Algorithms (fwd)

Header Data

From: Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
To: IPG Sales <ipgsales@cyberstation.net>
Message Hash: 734b7613bccf7a2b0031aadabb343cbca01b2869c37a496024221533bff662b1
Message ID: <314EBE25.7655@tivoli.com>
Reply To: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960318230857.7336L-101000@citrine.cyberstation.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-19 14:20:28 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:20:28 +0800

Raw message

From: Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 22:20:28 +0800
To: IPG Sales <ipgsales@cyberstation.net>
Subject: Re: IPG - newest release of the ABC Encryption Algorithms (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSD/.3.91.960318230857.7336L-101000@citrine.cyberstation.net>
Message-ID: <314EBE25.7655@tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


IPG Sales wrote:
> Obviously, you meet our requirements for the release of the IPG ABC
> Encryption algorithms. We need no further information from you. though we
> would appreciate your telephone num and snail mail address.

On the other hand, the "algorithm" as presented is so hopelessly 
obfuscated by the strange terminology and loose descriptions used
to present it that there's no way I (or anybody else) could seriously
evaluate it.  Either publish an algorithm in some accepted format
(a real C program, or even Knuth notation) or cut back your expectations
for public analysis.

______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX    * pain is inevitable  
       m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com          *
      <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101>         * suffering is optional





Thread