From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 07:01:27 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: FCC & Internet phones
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960309104642.19290A-100000@infinity.c2.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960309173236.108A-100000@gak>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 9 Mar 1996, Just Rich wrote:

> There's also an article in today's San Jose Mercury News.
> 
> I'm just wondering how the hell they would enforce regulations on carrying
> voice over the Internet. Are they going to analyze every packet? What
> happens when someone makes a trivial modification to the code, or adds a
> gateway, so that the voice call uses a different UDP (or more likely RTP)
> port and header format? 

I wonder what exactly the FCC means by the term "Internet Phone."  Does this
just mean that software like IPhone will be regulated, or will this also apply
to RealAudio and sending uuencoded .WAV files through e-mail.  Also, will
this regulation apply to video and audio software like CuSeeMe and Mbone
software?

- --Mark

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
markm@voicenet.com              | finger -l for PGP key 0xf9b22ba5
http://www.voicenet.com/~markm/ | bd24d08e3cbb53472054fa56002258d5
"The concept of normalcy is just a conspiracy of the majority" -me


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBMUIIBLZc+sv5siulAQGTbQQAhlNhKIDKfAnRS4gPXCtTmpcGwBZyHM+4
xQ6/Zvcep8V9xcGayNcA1RT7HFD1qpqIq7Xojgbg76Bv5mK9g4GEVvZN18tFeaDF
gcYYG4qO0Wz681D4KsAaeC9OZ8n59StjLGAn/CVmCgI31LCWr/oUYcN31E4+r3gM
QU7Ag55idnE=
=WFIz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----