1996-03-02 - Edited Edupage, 29 Feb 1996

Header Data

From: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
To: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Message Hash: 78ccee0b035eafc0920954352a9486ac771311189ef7933f2a2e3a380061c5cf
Message ID: <9603012357.AA27392@alpha>
Reply To: <01I1U06TWSP2AKTQC0@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-02 02:29:55 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 10:29:55 +0800

Raw message

From: m5@dev.tivoli.com (Mike McNally)
Date: Sat, 2 Mar 1996 10:29:55 +0800
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Edited Edupage, 29 Feb 1996
In-Reply-To: <01I1U06TWSP2AKTQC0@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <9603012357.AA27392@alpha>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



E. ALLEN SMITH writes:
 > The below is worrisome; I am willing to bet that the European
 > governments might try to require it, and that the US might follow suit if the
 > CDA gets tossed out (analogous to the V-chip). I'll send a further message
 > after I've analyzed the rating system in question a bit more.

Require it?  Of whom?  

What will all these people do the day somebody implements a new
web-like internet protocol and makes a daemon available for free
anonymous download?  There seems to be some kind of wierd idea
floating around that all we need to do is to "rate those web pages".

Anyway, I don't know what more needs to be said about a rating system
other than that it's a rating system.

______c_____________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX    * pain is inevitable  
       m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com          *
      <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101>         * suffering is optional





Thread