From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
To: N/A
Message Hash: 7d03ade174c6d2e99f74252f2d0d5f78ab19028cfb4b16520a0049fc3c12dc6b
Message ID: <QQahxz18204.199603210259@relay3.UU.NET>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-21 10:29:00 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 18:29:00 +0800
From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 18:29:00 +0800
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <QQahxz18204.199603210259@relay3.UU.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: <Deleted to protect the guilty>
To: anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com
Copies to: cypherpunks@toad.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Look above, note the "To:" Field, hmmmm, the offending l party mailed a responce
to an anon remailer.
I have noticed a couple people do this latley.
Please people - THINK, you have just proved beond a shadow of a doubt that you
are crypto illiterate.
The message is not sent back to the origional sender, it is either qued in the
remailer's In basket, till the remailer administrator cleans it out, or it is
trashed upon reciept since it does not have the required Request-Remailing-To:
format.
*sigh*, I will spare the offending parties the well deserved "Come back when
you get a clue" flame.
Regards,
Michael Peponis
PGP Key Avalible from MIT Key Server
Return to March 1996
Return to “owner-cypherpunks@toad.com”
1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 18:29:00 +0800) - No Subject - owner-cypherpunks@toad.com