1996-03-04 - Re: NYT on Crypto Bills

Header Data

From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Message Hash: 7e98a1aca74d1e8b809818b70f13f97f40976efe2c229b54949bc54a0bebb46c
Message ID: <199603041509.KAA02654@homeport.org>
Reply To: <199603041358.IAA23170@pipe1.nyc.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-04 18:12:22 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 02:12:22 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 1996 02:12:22 +0800
To: jya@pipeline.com (John Young)
Subject: Re: NYT on Crypto Bills
In-Reply-To: <199603041358.IAA23170@pipe1.nyc.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <199603041509.KAA02654@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


	Markoff shouyld know better than this.  There is a long
history of business use of codes & ciphers, going back hundereds of
years, and durring the heyday of the telegraph, there were fair size
companies that created codebooks with (locally configurable)
superencipherment systems for the market.

Adam

John Young wrote:

|    Compromise Bills Due on Data Encryption 
|       Industry Opponents and Civil Libertarians Are Lukewarm, 
|       at Best 
|    By John Markoff 

|    Data-coding, or encryption, technology is based on 
|    mathematical formulas that rely on the immense computing 
|    challenge inherent in factoring large numbers. Until 
|    recently, such technology was largely used by military and 
|    intelligence organizations and by some corporations like 
|    banks. As electronic mail and commerce have become 
|    increasingly accessible, however, the technology has become 
|    more controversial. 

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume






Thread