From: geeman@best.com
To: JonWienke@aol.com
Message Hash: 85ea7272258ec6e2938d50a557bf568d363da749c854d2b816da5a2b6d6a2f74
Message ID: <199603071709.JAA17447@dns1.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-07 18:28:26 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 02:28:26 +0800
From: geeman@best.com
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 02:28:26 +0800
To: JonWienke@aol.com
Subject: Re: What's anyone know about Teledyne Electronic Technologies?
Message-ID: <199603071709.JAA17447@dns1.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 01:42 AM 3/7/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>Teledyne (TET) is out marketing a "new" crypto system as a competitor
>>against DES and what TET calls "linear" cryptosystems. They are claiming
>>a non-linear approach in which (as best I can tell) they are permuting
>>the s-boxes and using 4 bit/16 entry substitution tables.
>
>
A couple of points:
1. DES is nonlinear and (I believe) provably not a group; that TET is
alluding to DES being linear casts grave doubt. If their S-Box "permutes"
I'd also be concerned!
>Dont trust it unless you are a good cryptanalyst and have a copy of the
>source code. Most commercial crypto products are crap.
>
>Jonathan Wienke
>
2. Most NEW UNPROVEN CRYPTOSYSTEMS are crap, not crypto products. That's
too strong an assertion. Plenty of commercial crypto products(and perhaps
"most" which in significant commercial disctribution) are based on strong
DES/RSA, etc. proven technologies.
Return to March 1996
Return to “geeman@best.com”
1996-03-07 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 02:28:26 +0800) - Re: What’s anyone know about Teledyne Electronic Technologies? - geeman@best.com