From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Message Hash: 866d5d4a1b49292c59f1e1e4f2651438f4860509758845417ad7630251e863a5
Message ID: <199603110505.VAA03962@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-11 07:02:23 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 15:02:23 +0800
From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 15:02:23 +0800
To: wb8foz@nrk.com
Subject: Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM radio?
Message-ID: <199603110505.VAA03962@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 09:26 PM 3/10/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>> Subject asks it. I'm not a HAM, but still curious. Wonder if anyone
>> has brought this to Leahy's attention...
>>
>> Comments from the packet folx on the list?
>
>Non-cleartext has been forbidden for last 60 years anyhow.
Yes, but the law _might_ have the side-effect of changing that.
It'd be real pleasant if it does... I suspect the best way to make
that happen would be to say "shhhh" any time anyone proposes
mentioning the topic to a politician....
#--
# Thanks; Bill
# Bill Stewart, stewarts@ix.netcom.com, +1-415-442-2215 pager 408-787-1281
# "At year's end, however, new government limits on Internet access threatened
# to halt the growth of Internet use. [...] Government control of news media
# generally continues to depend on self-censorship to regulate political and
# social content, but the authorities also consistently penalize those who
# exceed the permissable." - US government statement on China...
Return to March 1996
Return to “Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>”
1996-03-11 (Mon, 11 Mar 1996 15:02:23 +0800) - Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto over HAM radio? - Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>