From: Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1996 08:19:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Crypto Export Legislation?
Message-ID: <199603032329.SAA22483@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I took a look at the text of the bill.  There was a line in it making
it a crime to use crypto in a way that obstructs a federal investigation.
While understandable, this is too vague... it could easily be interpreted
(IMO) as any strong crypto without escrow of some kind.

Anyone else feel this way about that line in the bill?
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMTorUyoZzwIn1bdtAQEWJgGA1KdA1HtbX9L0U22rBLKFouIQHQniAdA3
lvimml/i+Z/KmYSmHGqkGBwCb1hAfSxc
=E2ZA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----