From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 03:19:00 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Subject: Re: Note: Problems Confronting the Asset Concealer [Part 1 of 2 of Volume I]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960329170907.15388E-100000@polaris.mindport.net>
Message-ID: <199603301540.KAA07025@homeport.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


Black Unicorn wrote:

| While direct crypto relevance is limited, I thought that this work 
| might interest many on the list and so I decided to post it in any 
| event.  The sections on fourth and fifth amendment protections, or 
| lack thereof, for banking documents might shed some light on the 
| eventual disposition of crypto keys under the same circumstances.

	Actually, this is not all all irrelevant.  The question of how
a non-American living in the US can benefit from writign crypto code
has been a topic of discussion the last few days.  A real
understanding of laundering is needed for the time between now and
when the bad guys stop trying to tax the non-physical.

	I look forward to having a chance to read it. 

Adam

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume