1996-03-08 - Re: Not a good idea…

Header Data

From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
To: Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
Message Hash: 8d57e3d8c39226dfb0aba229fcc815fdec34adde72b64c8202b21c461e258d0b
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960308104119.29952C-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
Reply To: <199603080546.XAA00397@proust.suba.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-08 16:56:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 00:56:01 +0800

Raw message

From: Michael Froomkin <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 00:56:01 +0800
To: Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
Subject: Re: Not a good idea...
In-Reply-To: <199603080546.XAA00397@proust.suba.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960308104119.29952C-100000@viper.law.miami.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 7 Mar 1996, Alex Strasheim wrote:

> I might be stretching things a bit, but couldn't you call a CA a "review
> service"?  Essentially instead of having a banned list, you have an 
>"accepted list". > 

Nice try.  Wish my students were that creative.  I don't think it works,
though, at least when CA's represent that their info is suitable for
relying parties to use in financial transactions (something Siskel & Ebert
do not do!). 

A. Michael Froomkin        | +1 (305) 284-4285; +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)
Associate Professor of Law | 
U. Miami School of Law     | froomkin@law.miami.edu
P.O. Box 248087            | http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin
Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA | It's warm here.






Thread