From: Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 12:00:44 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FCC & Internet phones
Message-ID: <199603100222.VAA06105@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

t byfield wrote:
[..]
>  doubt the situation for bureaucratic rule-mongering would be much
>  different. The WP article said that has ACTA has "asked the [FCC] to stop
>  this kind of communications and study how to regulate it," probably--and
>  not surprisingly --in that order.

I noticed they complainted about IPhone "giving away our product for
free" or something like that. Bad implications. Imagine MS going after
the FreeDOS people, or Novel or AT&T or whoever owns Unix now going after
Linux or the FSF/GNU...

[..]
>         Q: Is it practically possible to find netphone traffic on a
> generic network at any level above the source and target addresses?

Good question.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service

iQBFAwUBMUI89CoZzwIn1bdtAQFXBAF/RSoygg/szTsrtI+Ds512YDV3KswRP43r
4HfgV+PHex3JqnhOWNbWuNga05EsFDJp
=EcBe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----