1996-03-10 - Re: FCC & Internet phones

Header Data

From: Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8dd218f09386c63d1254835b46ca42a6d8835f17a957c9ea726da1b2dc267be8
Message ID: <199603100222.VAA06105@bb.hks.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-10 04:00:44 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 12:00:44 +0800

Raw message

From: Mutant Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 12:00:44 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: FCC & Internet phones
Message-ID: <199603100222.VAA06105@bb.hks.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


t byfield wrote:
>  doubt the situation for bureaucratic rule-mongering would be much
>  different. The WP article said that has ACTA has "asked the [FCC] to stop
>  this kind of communications and study how to regulate it," probably--and
>  not surprisingly --in that order.

I noticed they complainted about IPhone "giving away our product for
free" or something like that. Bad implications. Imagine MS going after
the FreeDOS people, or Novel or AT&T or whoever owns Unix now going after
Linux or the FSF/GNU...

>         Q: Is it practically possible to find netphone traffic on a
> generic network at any level above the source and target addresses?

Good question.
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service.  A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]

Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service