1996-03-09 - Re: SEAL cipher info requested (something actually list related!)

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Message Hash: 94e9e7eb17f9722317205787e65a1ad399b466dec6eb5e13bf4dc7f3c1d98864
Message ID: <199603060751.CAA09041@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199603060521.AAA15746@homeport.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-09 13:38:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 21:38:17 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 21:38:17 +0800
To: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
Subject: Re: SEAL cipher info requested (something actually list related!)
In-Reply-To: <199603060521.AAA15746@homeport.org>
Message-ID: <199603060751.CAA09041@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Adam Shostack writes:
> |   * is there something better then SEAL available?
> 
> 	How about Blowfish?

I believe blowfish has been partially cracked, but I forget which
conference the paper was presented at.

.pm

Thread

• Return to March 1996

• Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>”
• Return to “Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@consensus.com>”
• Return to “droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)”

• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”

• 1996-03-07 (Thu, 7 Mar 1996 11:29:53 +0800) - Re: SEAL cipher info requested (something actually list related!) - droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
  • 1996-03-06 (Wed, 6 Mar 1996 11:51:21 +0800) - Re: SEAL cipher info requested (something actually list related!) - Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@consensus.com>
    • 1996-03-08 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 08:25:30 +0800) - Re: SEAL cipher info requested (something actually list related!) - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
      • 1996-03-09 (Sat, 9 Mar 1996 21:38:17 +0800) - Re: SEAL cipher info requested (something actually list related!) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>