1996-03-12 - re: Video resolution

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: “A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 96271540871c30a72b7d6de06d09a0e823084f6d332e9b4467914a8834700d05
Message ID: <199603120520.VAA08288@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-12 09:37:08 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 17:37:08 +0800

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 17:37:08 +0800
To: "A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: Video resolution
Message-ID: <199603120520.VAA08288@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 10:14 AM 3/11/96 -0500, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security wrote:
>Note: this refers to the IBM PC & clones only
>
>> The point is that they do a lousy job on dithering.  So does Microsoft
>> explorer.  They probably purchased the identical code from some clot.

>Have been watching this go back and forth & get further from the original
>question as usual. I suspect that if the original poster looks in her/his/
>its/other SYSTEM.INI file, the line "display.drv=vga.drv" will be found in
>the [boot] section. This is the default 16 color driver installed by 
>Windows to be compatible with every 256k 640x480 VGA card.


And I also remembered to turn the computer on.

I can assure you that I know how many colors my screen supports, and I have 
numerous dithering programs on my computer, two of them written by me.


 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread