1996-03-12 - Re: Leahy and Mrs. Bemmis (now that’s a subject line)

Header Data

From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a4a36309dbca9cc62264ca45d13141ff79afffdbfd6ba4dc1afbfe9bb59a3ad5
Message ID: <199603120603.WAA12207@dns2.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-12 10:05:36 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 18:05:36 +0800

Raw message

From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 18:05:36 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Leahy and Mrs. Bemmis (now that's a subject line)
Message-ID: <199603120603.WAA12207@dns2.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:24 AM 3/11/96 -0500, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security wrote:
> At the same time am pragmatic enough to accept the idea that it will have
> no effect unless it passes and to be passed today it must have something
> like the criminalization statement. 

I am glad to hear that the bill can be easily stopped.  I think we should 
do something to kill it right away.

The only good thing the bill does is give big companies the same power 
that most of us now possess -- the power to export crypto and get away
with it.   A good thing, a very good thing, but small change compared to 
the important individual liberties that the bill lightly discards.

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread