From: jamesd@echeque.com
To: jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: a61bddfc1dd26a9e3687d9e3d99c474dd1fe3804814a42a61ce8459ca2f598b3
Message ID: <199603301919.LAA26836@dns1.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-30 23:51:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 07:51:01 +0800
From: jamesd@echeque.com
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 07:51:01 +0800
To: jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: New crypto bill to be introduced
Message-ID: <199603301919.LAA26836@dns1.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In my previous posting, I said that the Burns bill suggested that
I had been too paranoid.
Wrong.
As usual, not paranoid enough.
The Burns bill, and the "assault" weapons bill, and several other bills,
are like TV wrestling.
The participants are working to a script with a predetermined outcome
that they have agreed to in advance.
The Burns bill will not only fail, it is intended to fail. That is
why it was introduced now, when it is guaranteed to be painlessly
guillotined by the elections.
Politicians have their ear to the ground. They are very much aware
that the elite and the middle class are increasingly cynical about
democracy and hostile to the corrupt poltical process, that many
large groups see the government as unconstitutional and illegitimate,
and see no hope or benefit in participation in politics.
The purpose of these bills is not to change who gets screwed, but
to draw those who are screwed back into the political process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the state. | jamesd@echeque.com
Return to March 1996
Return to “jamesd@echeque.com”
1996-03-30 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 07:51:01 +0800) - Re: New crypto bill to be introduced - jamesd@echeque.com