From: “David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a9d37f10a2b2f9c7012ca329e459697e23b913b905fd97b7b573c6151845e1cf
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960322142245.00693c74@204.248.40.2>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-22 17:04:05 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 01:04:05 +0800
From: "David E. Smith" <dsmith@midwest.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 1996 01:04:05 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: A funny story [noise]
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960322142245.00693c74@204.248.40.2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 08:52 PM 3/21/96 PST, hoz@univel wrote:
>>... someone had left thier keys in the door lock.
>> So being the good cypherpunk that I am I jumped out and grabbed the
>>keys from the lock, then knocked on the window. The passenger rolled
>>down the window and accepted the keys back. Much to my surprise the
>>passenger was none other than Whitfield Diffie.
>
>Let me get this straight. You performed a key exchange with
>Whitfield Diffie? His keys were publicly available, and you
>securely transferred them back again? What a concept!
Weren't those his _private_ keys, though? You probably shouldn't be able
to transfer those in a secure system.
ObCrypto: would the transfer of private keys be necessarily a good
thing? Or would a transfer of "reputation" be a better idea?
Example: suppose, and this is _very_ hypothetical, that the President
of the U.S. has a PGP key. (We can dream, eh?) Would it be
wiser to transfer that key from one President to the next, or have
the President sign the President-elect's new key?
(I'm stretching here - feel free to killfile me.)
dave
--- David Smith, Intellecutal Terrorist
http://www.midwest.net/scribers/dsmith/
Return to March 1996
Return to ““David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>”
1996-03-22 (Sat, 23 Mar 1996 01:04:05 +0800) - Re: A funny story [noise] - “David E. Smith” <dsmith@midwest.net>