From: “Erik E. Fair” (Time Keeper) <fair@clock.org>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: b5edfa6e748519833519b25dc36054edbdc0f067c7dd360ccfba608e4cbc5b00
Message ID: <v02140b04ad76ca8569ef@[204.94.116.246]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-21 12:28:01 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 20:28:01 +0800
From: "Erik E. Fair" (Time Keeper) <fair@clock.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 20:28:01 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy's crypto bill
Message-ID: <v02140b04ad76ca8569ef@[204.94.116.246]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I feel a bit stupid right now. I read Leahy's bill from top to bottom
shortly after it was submitted, and aside from the provision which
separately criminalizes the use of encryption in a the comission of a crime
or to obstruct justice, I fail to see the flaws that you see.
Could you spend a little time enumerating the flaws in this bill as you see
them, with reference to the particular wording in Leahy's bill?
thanks for your time & trouble,
Erik Fair
Return to March 1996
Return to ““Erik E. Fair” (Time Keeper) <fair@clock.org>”
1996-03-21 (Thu, 21 Mar 1996 20:28:01 +0800) - Re: Dorothy Denning attacks Leahy’s crypto bill - “Erik E. Fair” (Time Keeper) <fair@clock.org>