From: Tim Fulbright <100022.3167@compuserve.com>
To: BlindCopyReceiver:;
Message Hash: b603a08db351c9494edc36fc3fb54a9eb38c3f0977398d7a7fa63395095508b8
Message ID: <960319215351100022.3167_EHV88-1@CompuServe.COM>
Reply To: _N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-20 08:20:08 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:20:08 +0800
From: Tim Fulbright <100022.3167@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 16:20:08 +0800
To: BlindCopyReceiver:;
Subject: Mr Emmett Page, Asst. Sect. Defense, CCCI
Message-ID: <960319215351_100022.3167_EHV88-1@CompuServe.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I think you or someone here recently remarked the U.S.Government has the only
_real_ capability to wage world terrorism on the internet, and after I read
Frank Sowa's feb. Boardwatch article I'm beginning to wonder. I suppose
quoting the article at length will be at least as good as some of the other
traffic around here... just in case anybody missed it, Sowa reviewed 35 federal
reports, and quotes Page saying "As a result, we've had no choice but to create
an offensive capability in cyberspace. I can't discuss it ... However, you'd
feel good and feel safe and secure if you knew about it" (yeah, really)
Further, Sowa reports the Natl Defense U is forming an elite Information Corps,
'a F0rce whose scope is to fight the battles of "Information Warfare from the
Pentagon war room to the home PCs" according to DOD' (p90-92).... And further,
RAND corp is using an "all out cyberwar simulator at their research center in
Santa Monica" and... oh well, the whole article is just crammed with stuff!
Yikes! I would sure like to know what people think about it. thanks.
Return to March 1996
Return to ““Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>”