From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
To: N/A
Message Hash: bdb1b09778c72d18df79e2be83a2e82cad7870fed280cfac4e9de819545b923f
Message ID: <QQagbn03009.199603072358@relay3.UU.NET>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-08 00:27:28 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 08:27:28 +0800
From: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 08:27:28 +0800
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <QQagbn03009.199603072358@relay3.UU.NET>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On the mailing list for the "Electronic Frontier Canada" (similar to, but
not a part of EFF), David Jones (djones@insight.dcss.McMaster.CA) writes:
>
> Feds want encryption; Police opposition ignored.
>
>The federal government wants its employees, and Canadians in general,
>to use strong, public-key encryption. Yes, the same encryption methods
>that American law enforcement is so uptight about. The same encryption
>that Canadian cops want to avoid, so they can continue to eavesdrop.
>
>It's summarized in a recent Ottawa Citizen article:
>
> gopher://insight.mcmaster.ca/00/org/efc/media/citizen.13feb96
>
>You may recall the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police (CACP)
>have voiced their opposition to any encryption of communications unless
>police had access to a "backdoor" last summer.
>
> gopher://insight.mcmaster.ca/00/org/efc/law/cacp.24aug95
>
>In Canada, it looks like the right to privacy of telecommunications
>might take precedence over the police interest in snooping to catch
>criminals.
I won't repost the entire article here, but here are some highlights:
- The system is initially intended to secure email between federal
government employees. Deployment is expected to begin next year.
- Key management is decentralized; each department hands out its own keys.
- Top-secret messages will be encoded using "palm-sized computer cards"
(presumably some kind of PCMCIA device).
- The Communications Security Establishment (~= NSA) helped to design
the system, and claims that it's "more sophisticated than existing
public versions".
(This is the part that still worries me a bit, even though EFC's
David Jones is quoted as saying that he has no concerns. Will the
algorithms be published? Also, why develop a new, untested system --
why not just buy the thing from RSA, Viacrypt, etc.? Stay tuned...)
- There's a great quote from Bob Little, deputy secretary of financial
and information management for the Treasury Board: "[The CSE] don't
have access to the keys . . . and never will. We did it to avoid
the American experience with the Clipper Chip."
- The RCMP (~= FBI) is not amused.
All in all, it sounds like a positive development for once.
--
Martin Janzen janzen@idacom.hp.com
Return to March 1996
Return to “owner-cypherpunks@toad.com”
1996-03-08 (Fri, 8 Mar 1996 08:27:28 +0800) - No Subject - owner-cypherpunks@toad.com