1996-03-09 - Re: Artist self censorship (Was Chinese net-censorship) Noise

Header Data

From: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bf0f8573f3ef1a5aae208189a550421b1cc4e0fe86e52a89bcf9749c8ef4c82a
Message ID: <9603091820.AA14468@cti02.citenet.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-09 20:19:32 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 04:19:32 +0800

Raw message

From: jf_avon@citenet.net (Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada))
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 04:19:32 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Artist self censorship (Was Chinese net-censorship) Noise
Message-ID: <9603091820.AA14468@cti02.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) said:

>before taking
>a picture he usually asks himself about how this picture is percived,
something
>the he never thought twice before the FBI raid.
>
>Mr. Avon should think twice before commenting on self censorship does not
>exist, for that could be the difference from having the door kicked in by the
>black ninja turtles with the FBI or toning down your work.

OK.  *THAT* might be interpreted, wrongly, as self-censorship.  But words 
have a *precise* meaning, which unfortunately, I sometimes miss in 
the english language.

The opinion I wrote was in the *context* of the interaction of an artist with
a purchaser.  In that context, what govern the events is consensuality:
everybody acts *uncoerced* to his best advantage.


In the case you cite, the *context* is very different.

But still, I would not call it "self-censorship".  I do not have, on the top
of my head, any precise term for it, but maybe FUD, fear of physical violence,
survival tactics while harrassed by a thuggish assaulter, etc.,  would
apply...


I did not think twice, I thought about it several hundred times...

Your comment is *very* interesting.  It point out how peoples can so
easily blank out contextual information.

Forgive my bias but I personnally makes a big distinction between the 
volitional initiation of physical violence (or menace of) and other situations
where it is absent.

Regards!

JFA


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i

iQEVAwUBMUF6K8iycyXFit0NAQFoBgf/Tt0zFCaRNJFBwZcxsV/v5ABnjjnAtqoT
EDF0OA7+UogWT1MXL8RP58tQ2vTwUWJ1PdK/gdnwlkjpwxC0i4gRx1HpnCLOjRlL
UgkUKu5qiyIWKd6upCYCMd1NCbqaffHjWr3pWxVFE/zPaCQ7mlrZZV4QBeV/bKbU
djt70BQTa7WFvQwZWkVO7QcxOawjzItyZErusdEIvPz03MqbcqSaQu0NgtEy/Zwu
82CSF10uTL96TzjXm1icASiquDk8Tj+go8WqC1FZ8uK3kFHDDkEuLqzXdtG6sJKK
hV4PPfehyjXXXB2CADmXMnXZVLkWU0x5Ig7l/bdOETrPhfl07Di9tQ==
=1OeX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 Public Key at http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon
    Jean-Francois Avon <jf_avon@citenet.net> 
    2048 bits key ID:C58ADD0D  1996/03/01    
fingerprint=52 96 45 E8 20 5A 8A 5E  F8 7C C8 6F AE FE F8 91 






Thread