1996-03-15 - Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto

Header Data

From: “Deranged Mutant” <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: bfed55edd482cfb3180c1830573f14e39520ec97dd0331a914675d44a1021db7
Message ID: <199603151658.LAA06153@unix.asb.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-15 18:27:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 02:27:29 +0800

Raw message

From: "Deranged Mutant" <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 02:27:29 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Why escrow? (was Re: How would Leahy bill affect crypto
Message-ID: <199603151658.LAA06153@unix.asb.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On 14 Mar 96 at 19:41, jim bell wrote:


> >Of course that depends how you give your key to an escrow agent. If 
> >it's already escrowed when you buy a phone, for instance...
> 
> That's the real danger with any such legislation.  Individuals can generally 
> only get things that are manufactured for sale.  (You can't buy a car with a 
> 7-cylinder engine, for instance...)  If manufacturers are dissuaded from 
> building a good crypto telephone, then key-escrow can be as "voluntary" as 
> you want and you still won't be able to exercise your rights. 

You might sill be able to buy an unescrowed crypto-phone. If forgeign 
companies start selling them, then the gov't will have a hard time 
preventing domestic companies from manufacturing them and exporting 
them (in theory...) under the legislation.

Rob. 

---
Send a blank message with the subject "send pgp-key" (not in
quotes) to <WlkngOwl@unix.asb.com> for a copy of my PGP key.





Thread